On 8/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this
> > current thread can be marked as spam and forgotten without any serious
> > loss.
> I am sorry if that spamimg comment was ment to me.
No, hey, thanks for your post!
I just meant that if that was the problem, *my* mails were com
> this
> current thread can be marked as spam and forgotten without any serious
> loss.
I am sorry if that spamimg comment was ment to me. As I am not wery
experienced in bug finding and this was the first attempt to report
something, the correct way to helping debugging is something I will be
able
On 8/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My card worked under GNU/Hurd. (Was able for exapmle to ping)
> Probably you have to configure your interface. The answer how to do it is
> probably here:
>
> http://web.walfield.org/pub/people/neal/papers/hurd-installation-guide/english/h
you have to configure your interface. The answer how to do it is
probably here:
http://web.walfield.org/pub/people/neal/papers/hurd-installation-guide/english/hurd-install-guide.html#SEC7
Best wishes,
Janka
> On 8/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tal
On 8/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I talk about network adapter which is present in linux and in HURD by
> documentation. And in Windows it easily can recognized. I gain not
> recall it's name. It is similar to rtl8139.
Can you check the name, ple
I talk about network adapter which is present in linux and in HURD by
documentation. And in Windows it easily can recognized. I gain not
recall it's name. It is similar to rtl8139.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
On 8/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably that model is supported. (Also do not remeber the model name
> correctly, on linux the driver name was [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a quite similar
You're definitely talking about rtl8139.
Gianluca
P.S. (Sorry prikulis, I previously s
Probably that model is supported. (Also do not remeber the model name
correctly, on linux the driver name was [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a quite similar
number, but we may not have similar cards). Mine was working, but You
might have a different card model than I have.
As now i am not at home, i can no
On 8/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rtl8931 I don't remember number exectly. I can make a mistake. But in
> Linux there is a module rtl8931.o And when are drivers in Mach? In
> kernel itself? Not in modules?
not rtl8139?
If so, it might be that the PCI ID is not present in t
rtl8931 I don't remember number exectly. I can make a mistake. But in
Linux there is a module rtl8931.o And when are drivers in Mach? In
kernel itself? Not in modules?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/b
settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a 192.168.83.39
-g 192.168.83.38 -m 255.255.252.0
Double check your netmask, it should probobly be 255.255.255.0.
And why socket 2 not 1? I have only one ethernet card.
/servers/socket/1 (or 2) has nothing to do with ethernet car
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:08:56PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have standart network adapter Realtec. I installed it on Debian
> GNU/Linux. But for HURD it does not work.
> settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a 192.168.83.39
> -g 192.168.83.38 -m 255.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Sun 21 Aug 2005 16:08:56 +0400, a écrit :
> And why socket 2 not 1? I have only one ethernet card.
2 stands for PF_INET
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
I have standart network adapter Realtec. I installed it on Debian
GNU/Linux. But for HURD it does not work.
settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a 192.168.83.39
-g 192.168.83.38 -m 255.255.252.0 The computer print something similar
"Translator died wrong address read hel
14 matches
Mail list logo
