On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 05:27:57AM -0400, Gaute B Strokkenes wrote:
>> Yes. It is up to you to eventually decide whether it is easier to
>> keep the extra information together with or separate from the
>> character number. I'm just pointing out tha
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you want to design a console/terminal emulator in The Right
> Way(tm), then you might want to have a look at the linux-utf8 [sic]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists,
That should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]; that is
these are two sep
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:13:47PM -0400, Gaute B Strokkenes wrote:
>> Any Unicode character will fit in 21 bits, so you have plenty of
>> bits left over for attributes of various sorts. Furthermore, the
>> Unicode standard guarantees that this will
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 02:18:33AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> There are probably more points that I forgot now,
>
> Oh, yeah, the exact data format of the mmap'able area.
>
> We need to store the character value and the attributes (bold, col
