Hello Rene
On 8/15/18 11:09 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rene, le mer. 15 août 2018 02:47:51 +, a ecrit:
>> I'm compiling hurd package from git 06429d67b7e9be332d1012ed4c2bba694e5ddabb
>> through Guix and I've the following error:
>>
>>
Hello,
Rene, le mer. 15 août 2018 02:47:51 +, a ecrit:
> I'm compiling hurd package from git 06429d67b7e9be332d1012ed4c2bba694e5ddabb
> through Guix and I've the following error:
>
> wire.c:227:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘vm_wire_all’
> [-Wimpl
Hello,
I'm compiling hurd package from git 06429d67b7e9be332d1012ed4c2bba694e5ddabb
through Guix and I've the following error:
gcc -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -Wall -g -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -I.
-I.. -I../include -I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DPA
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 09 Feb 2015 11:47:34 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Mon 09 Feb 2015 11:15:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > Oops, tests were fine on my box, but not on buildds: the latest hurd
> > package with latest startup changes makes them unbootable, with a mere
> &g
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 09 Feb 2015 11:15:22 +0100, a écrit :
> Oops, tests were fine on my box, but not on buildds: the latest hurd
> package with latest startup changes makes them unbootable, with a mere
>
> ../../startup/startup.c:712: launch_core_servers: Unexpected error:
> (
Hello,
Oops, tests were fine on my box, but not on buildds: the latest hurd
package with latest startup changes makes them unbootable, with a mere
../../startup/startup.c:712: launch_core_servers: Unexpected error:
(ipc/mig) server died.
I don't know why yet.
Samuel
Please follow-up to debian-hurd, this is really off-topic on bug-hurd.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Would setting up more buildds help with this issue? With current boom
> of virtualization setting up an obsolete system becomes quite easy ;-)
> Plus you get th
On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 12:22:48 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EM
Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 12:22:48 +0100, a écrit :
> On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
> > > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If packages are missing it should be res
On 19/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 17:01:21 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > > Plus keep all versions of pack
Michal Suchanek, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 10:53:13 +0100, a écrit :
> On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 17:01:21 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > Plus keep all versions of packages on some "hurd-core" list until
> > > > > somebody manually mark
On 18/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Suchanek, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 17:01:21 +0100, a écrit :
>
> > > > Plus keep all versions of packages on some "hurd-core" list until
> > > > somebody manually marks a newer version as verified working.
> > >
> > >
> > > It's not
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:19:51PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Is there anything I can do ?
Well, debug why -7 stalls on most apt-get operations. Any information
there is probably valueable. Also, building the -7 source package with
different versions of the toolchain (glibc, gcc, binutils
Thomas Schwinge on Sunday 09 Jul 2006 16:16 wrote:
> No, unfortunately not. So far, nobody tracked down what exactly is
> causing these problems when upgrading from the `-6' hurd package to the
> `-7' one. Probably there are issues with the tool chain; perhaps there
> i
On Sunday 09 July 2006 22:46, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> [Cced to bug-hurd.]
>
>
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 02:28:39PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I remember the hurd package creating problems.
>
> Correct. The Debian hurd 20050513-7 package will
[Cced to bug-hurd.]
Hello!
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 02:28:39PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I remember the hurd package creating problems.
Correct. The Debian hurd 20050513-7 package will make your system break
down sooner or later, sloppily stated.
> Is it safe to upgrade now
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hurd package needs to drop /sbin/fsck (was: Re: hurd 20040508-3 with the
ext2fs patch)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PRO
n
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable main
>
> Is this expected? (I realise that Debian/Hurd is work in progess :-))
Sort of. e2fsprogs now builds the /sbin/fsck wrapper itself, so it
should not be build by the Hurd package anymore. A new hurd package
should be uploaded to fix this.
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
o #149309 - Not fixed; patch attached, has Marcus' blessing.
o #156600 - Fixed.
o #177486 - Not fixed; patch rejected by Neal.
o #184344 - Not fixed; patch attached.
o #190732 - Not fixed; patch attached.
o #196913 - Not fixed; no patch.
o http://bugs.debian.org/c
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:24:50AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Small run down on what is fixed and what is not fixed in CVS, and what
> has a patch attached. I'll see if I can comment about some of the
> patches in more detail today (I'll probobly comment about them in a
> reply to this mail)
Small run down on what is fixed and what is not fixed in CVS, and what
has a patch attached. I'll see if I can comment about some of the
patches in more detail today (I'll probobly comment about them in a
reply to this mail); so consider this mail as a list of things that
need to be checked then a
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 10:41, Robert Millan wrote:
> I don't have much experience with dbs-style packaging though. Jeff, what
> do you suggest? cdbs?
Yes - I recommend cdbs. The problem is that there's a bunch of magic in
the documentation handling because our build env doesn't behave in an
expect
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > If someone beats me to it, then great.
> >
> > no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > If someone beats me to it, then great.
>
> no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a minute to check mail)
finished with exams! :)
looking at the package, i
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable
> in the archive.
I think I've uploaded a tetex-bin build some time ago. Does it look like
a build problem or are there bugs in the package? I guess I could try
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable
> in the archive. Decided that solving that was a task for Monday as I
> have a guest in town.
tetex-bin has been broken a pair of times for all arches (see the c
I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable
in the archive. Decided that solving that was a task for Monday as I
have a guest in town.
If someone beats me to it, then great.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 20:08, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:05:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> with this one there are six bugs for package hurd in the BTS that
> either are fixed in CVS or have an attached patch.
>
> a fast look brought me:
>
> 190732, 156600, 184344, 149309, 177486, 196913
>
> are you going to upload a new
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:41:20PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: hurd
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
with this one there are six bugs for package hurd in the BTS that
either are fixed in CVS or have an attached patch.
a fast look brought me:
190732, 156600, 184344, 149309, 177486, 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 195318 hurd
Bug#195318: parted: Parted will not build
Bug reassigned from package `parted' to `hurd'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
30 matches
Mail list logo
