Hi, Jess
You are right, after I pushed this patch to the upstream repository
and the maintainer merged it.
He gave me an reply saying the `stropts.h` now seemed meaningless
since most major platforms
do not support it, so does GNU Hurd. These lines will be completely
removed in the
On 9 May 2021, at 14:56, hahawang wrote:
>
> Package: gftp
> Severity: important
> Version: 2.7.0b-1
> Tags: ftbfs,patch
> User:hahawang
> Usertags: hurd,hurd-i386
> X-Debbugs-CC:debian-h...@lists.debian.org,bug-hurd@gnu.org
>
> I decide to fix a broken package found at the recommended
> page(h
On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 21:56 +0800, hahawang wrote:
> Package: gftp
> Severity: important
> Version: 2.7.0b-1
> Tags: ftbfs,patch
> User:hahawang
> Usertags: hurd,hurd-i386
> X-Debbugs-CC:debian-h...@lists.debian.org,bug-hurd@gnu.org
>
> +#if !(defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined
Hello,
hahawang, le dim. 09 mai 2021 21:56:58 +0800, a ecrit:
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
>
> #elif HAVE_GRANTPT
>
> -#if !(defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__APPLE__) ||
> defined(__linux__))
> +#if !(defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__APPLE__) ||
> defined(
I am sorry for the unindented patch file, due to the thunderbird mail
client(or may be I do not know how to use it correctly), so I decide to
reply it with a correctly indented patch file.
---
hahawang
--- a/lib/pty.c
+++ b/lib/pty.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
#elif HAVE_GRANTPT
-#if !(defined(__
Package: gftp
Severity: important
Version: 2.7.0b-1
Tags: ftbfs,patch
User:hahawang
Usertags: hurd,hurd-i386
X-Debbugs-CC:debian-h...@lists.debian.org,bug-hurd@gnu.org
I decide to fix a broken package found at the recommended
page(https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/out_of_date.txt)named `gftp`
