On 30/06/11 13:52, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Thu 30 Jun 2011 11:45:31 +0200, a écrit :
>> I don't, but where do we use getauth() ? I can't see that in
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/unsubmitted-sendmsg-SCM_RIGHTS.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Thu 30 Jun 2011 11:45:31 +0200, a écrit :
> I don't, but where do we use getauth() ? I can't see that in
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/unsubmitted-sendmsg-SCM_RIGHTS.diff?revision=4773&view=markup
I've patched i
On 27/06/11 21:37, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> zsh started failing to build it static variant on hurd-i386 since we
> added the sendmsg(SCM_RIGHTS) patch. This is because it uses getauth(),
> which thus pulls hurdports.o from libcrt.a, and thus getproc(), for
> which zsh already provides a
> zsh started failing to build it static variant on hurd-i386 since we
> added the sendmsg(SCM_RIGHTS) patch. This is because it uses getauth(),
> which thus pulls hurdports.o from libcrt.a, and thus getproc(), for
> which zsh already provides a symbol, and they hence conflict.
>
> Emilio, do you
Hello,
zsh started failing to build it static variant on hurd-i386 since we
added the sendmsg(SCM_RIGHTS) patch. This is because it uses getauth(),
which thus pulls hurdports.o from libcrt.a, and thus getproc(), for
which zsh already provides a symbol, and they hence conflict.
Emilio, do you reme
