On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:25:42PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I'm looking at this just for "fun". Should we add our own hurd-i386-foo
> files or gnu-i386-foo, or try to shoehorn our stuff into using something
> like linux-i386-low?
You probably want a gnu-i386-low.c. I don't think you'll b
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
GNU/Hurd?
I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no.
As far as I know.
In case you don't know: this would a
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
> > GNU/Hurd?
>
> I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no.
As far as I know.
> > In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging programs on
>
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:10:22 +0100
> From: Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello!
>
> Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
> GNU/Hurd?
I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no.
> In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging progra
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:56:17PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> If you have any reports about gdbserver not working on GNU/Hurd then
> report them here so that they can be fixed.
Uhm, that's exactly what I did in my original email, you may want to
re-read it:
| Has anyone ever worked on porti
Hello!
Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
GNU/Hurd?
In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging programs on
GNU/Hurd systems using a cross debugger running on another system (e.g. a
non GNU/Hurd one). This is of advantage if you're cross compiling an
