> I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know that
> he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we would
> have to add each feature we depend on into our configure.in.
Or just write it off.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[E
Why not just mentioning the required version/date of glibc in
INSTALL?
It already says:
|The Hurd version 0.2 has been verified to work with versions 2.0.3
|and 2.0.4 of the GNU C library. (But note that version 2.0.3 has
|some easily-fixed bugs in compilation for the i386-gnu
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know
>> that he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we
>> would have to add each feature we depend on into our
>> configure.in.
>
>O
> I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know
> that he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we
> would have to add each feature we depend on into our
> configure.in.
Or just write it off.
If you mean that it is not worth it, then maybe. But th
There is no reason to do version checks. If you check for
anything, you check for the features you need.
I was thinking more along the lines so that the user will know that
he/she is using a old version of libc. Because otherwise we would
have to add each feature we depend on into our conf
There is no reason to do version checks. If you check for anything, you
check for the features you need.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Honestly, I would prefer that we just require pretty darn new libc
for use with hurd. But if that is really an imposition, using
#ifdef is fine for this. There is no great loss in just disabling
the new functionality.
I don't see any problems with this, the Hurd and glibc are quite
t
Honestly, I would prefer that we just require pretty darn new libc for use
with hurd. But if that is really an imposition, using #ifdef is fine for this.
There is no great loss in just disabling the new functionality.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL P
> Quoting "Dmitry V. Zhulanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > error. Make output attached. Here my actions:
> > Forgot something :)
>
> Thanks for this report. It seems that Roland commited some patches:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/hurd/hurd/exec/ChangeLog?rev=1.63&content-type
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:12:00PM +0600, Dmitry V. Zhulanov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:07:56PM +0100, M. Gerards wrote:
> > Thanks for this report. It seems that Roland commited some patches:
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/hurd/hurd/exec/ChangeLog?rev=1.63&content-type=
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:07:56PM +0100, M. Gerards wrote:
> Thanks for this report. It seems that Roland commited some patches:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/hurd/hurd/exec/ChangeLog?rev=1.63&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
Why this changes does not noticed in commit-hurd mai
../../exec/exec.c: In function `check_elf_phdr':
../../exec/exec.c:931: error: `PT_GNU_STACK' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../exec/exec.c:931: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../../exec/exec.c:931: error: for each function it appears in.)
You are
Quoting "Dmitry V. Zhulanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > error. Make output attached. Here my actions:
> Forgot something :)
Thanks for this report. It seems that Roland commited some patches:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/hurd/hurd/exec/ChangeLog?rev=1.63&content-type=text/vnd.view
Quoting "Dmitry V. Zhulanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Today I get sources from cvs on savannah, and make fails with
> error. Make output attached. Here my actions:
> $ cd hurd
> $ mkdir build
> $ cd build
> $ ../configure
> $ make
You are doing the right t
> error. Make output attached. Here my actions:
Forgot something :)
../../exec/exec.c: In function `check_elf_phdr':
../../exec/exec.c:931: error: `PT_GNU_STACK' undeclared (first use in this function)
../../exec/exec.c:931: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../../exe
Hi!
Today I get sources from cvs on savannah, and make fails with
error. Make output attached. Here my actions:
$ cd hurd
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ ../configure
$ make
Any ideas?
e
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
