Cans omebody please do the bootstrap test?
Thomas has tested it now (see message from him), OK to apply?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
> So can we apply this madness?
... and perhaps Debian's 11_nic_update.patch and 12_sis900.patch as
well?
Maybe...
> Thomas, can you describe the changes between the patch in the
> Debian package and the one on savannah?
Nothing serious; see the attached gnumach-savannah-debia
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:04:06PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> Cans omebody please do the bootstrap test?
>
>I've successfully done that using Alfred's cross-compiling guide.
>
> So can we apply this madness?
... and perhaps Debian's 11_nic_update.patch and 12_sis900.patch as well?
> Cans omebody please do the bootstrap test?
I've successfully done that using Alfred's cross-compiling guide.
So can we apply this madness?
Thomas, can you describe the changes between the patch in the Debian
package and the one on savannah?
And to who ever maintains the Debian GNU Mach
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:12:19PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Cans omebody please do the bootstrap test?
I've successfully done that using Alfred's cross-compiling guide.
To prepare GNU Mach's sources, I used the up-to-date patches from
Debian's gnumach_20050501-2.diff.gz:
debian/patches/00
Please can someone try these patches and do a complete bootstrap of
GNU/Hurd? My machine is already crawling on its four.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
At Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:26 +0200,
Alfred M Szmidt wrote:
>
> Can we _please_ apply the patches for updating all the related
> autoconf code right now?
Cans omebody please do the bootstrap test? What's the problem with
just testing the one potentially problematic scenario?
> The worst case sce
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we _please_ apply the patches for updating all the related
> autoconf code right now?
>
> The worst case scenario that will happen is that we won't be able to
> bootstrap, and if that actually would happen then we have two choices,
> revert or f
What kind of bootstrapping are you talking about anyway?
Please see previous threads in the archive about this.
If someone expects something won't work, we can test it.
And then expect that nobody actually does the test? Right
___
Bug-hurd
Can we _please_ apply the patches for updating all the related
autoconf code right now?
The worst case scenario that will happen is that we won't be able to
bootstrap, and if that actually would happen then we have two choices,
revert or fix; both which are trivial.
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
