Re: USB -- GPLv3 compatibility

2008-12-04 Thread Davi Leal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If you port a driver you should take into account the license such > > driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility. > > Currently the drivers live in GNU Mach, which is a dependency of the > actual Hurd, but otherwise they are quite disconnecte

Re: USB -- GPLv3 compatibility

2008-12-04 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:41:08AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote: > If you port a driver you should take into account the license such > driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility. Currently the drivers live in GNU Mach, which is a dependency of the actual Hurd, but other

Re: USB -- GPLv3 compatibility

2008-11-30 Thread Davi Leal
Thomas Schwinge wrote: > One thing to work on are device drivers. These would most probably be > ported from another operating system (Linux, *BSD) If you port a driver you should take into account the license such driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility. The GPLv3