Re: Restore GNU/Hurd functionality

2009-07-20 Thread Pedro Alves
On Monday 20 July 2009 15:53:34, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Well, thanks to you for helping with maintining GDB's Hurd port! If you > need help with a new Hurd image, or want shell access to a system > (), please just > speak up. (Likewise e

Re: Restore GNU/Hurd functionality

2009-07-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:22:34AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > I've had the patch below here for months already (I think I wrote it > around the the time of the solaris changes), but, > since I had borked by GNU/Hurd setup and hadn't found the energy > yet to restore it, I completelly forgo

Re: Restore GNU/Hurd functionality (was: Modernize solaris threads support.)

2009-07-20 Thread Pedro Alves
On Monday 20 July 2009 10:55:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > You did change the ``extern gnu_store_registers'' and ``extern > gnu_fetch_registers'' declarations in gnu-nat.c, but not their definitons > in i386gnu-nat.c, which I have committed now (as obvious). Sorry about that, and thanks for fixi

Restore GNU/Hurd functionality (was: Modernize solaris threads support.)

2009-07-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 02:38:58PM +, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 24 February 2009 14:33:05, Pierre Muller wrote: > > Pedro, > > you also broke windows-nat.c compilation... > > Uh! Darn it. [...] ... and another one (which I noticed only now...): when we recently got a new Debi