Re: Status report on the conversion of the Hurd to pthreads

2012-08-27 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:44:43PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > Debian packages are available for testing using this repository : > deb http://ftp.sceen.net/debian-hurd experimental/ > deb-src http://ftp.sceen.net/debian-hurd experimental/ > > Upgrade glibc packages first, then the hurd and netdd

Re: status

2008-11-13 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > The Hurd project said it would move to L4, this project has failed and > people are still confused about this several years later. We should > learn from this and not make any announcements or predictions on how > or when the H

Re: status

2008-11-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Sonntag 09 November 2008 11:52:01 schrieb Michael Banck: > You can have your hopes however you want, but it is not very productive > to hype up Viengoos as the next microkernel at this point. Neal has I'll try to be more clear that these are only my personal hopes next time. I thought that a

Re: status

2008-11-09 Thread Michael Banck
Arne, On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > If Viengoos fullfills the hopes I have in it since I read the paper from > Neal, > then it's likely that the GNU/Hurd will be ported to it. You can have your hopes however you want, but it is not very productive to

Re: status

2008-11-09 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
If Viengoos fullfills the hopes I have in it since I read the paper from Neal, then it's likely that the GNU/Hurd will be ported to it. In the meantime (the next few years at least I assume), the Hurd will use the gnumach kernel. If you're interested in Viengoos and porting the Hurd and stuff

Re: status

2008-11-08 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Saturday 08 November 2008 04:31:27 Gnu Logic wrote: > could someone please enlighten me on the current status of the GNU/Hurd > servers/kernel. Are the developers still looking to replace the Mach > kernel with the Coyotos microkernel? Currently they are first improving the Mach version, but N

Re: Status of the Hurd parts in glibc

2006-10-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:13:54AM -0400, I wrote: > The Hurd parts of glibc need maintenance! > > > We currently (have to) build glibc ``--without-tls'' and forcibly set > ``libc_cv_z_relro=no'', to work around bugs in the otherwise enabled > parts of the code. Both of those options are

Re: Status of ext2fs

2003-08-16 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Does anyone know about the current status of the ext2fs server and the problem of the filesystem size. The status is as before, >2gb partitions don't work. But some good news is in order, Ogi made a couple alpha-alpha patches avaiable that try to fix this limit. Search the archives for the

Re: Status of ext2fs

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 09:08:41PM +0200, Ireadyourmaillist wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know about the current status of the ext2fs server and the > problem of the filesystem size. There's an highly experimental patch; testers wanted; search the list archives and Savannah patch list for deta

Re: Status of the ppc port

2003-06-03 Thread Peter Bruin
> when storeio and pfinet work (how do you use it without storeio?), > it'd be interesting to bootstrap debian and start building debian > packages of the utils. besides what you have, we basicaly need perl, > sed, make, gawk and g++ for that. Actually, storeio does work, but only when linked stat

Re: Status of the ppc port

2003-06-02 Thread Moritz Schulte
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > when storeio and pfinet work (how do you use it without storeio?) Filesystems can be accessed without storeio - libstore is enough. Peter: Great work. moritz -- ((gpg-key-id . "6F984199") (email . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") (webpage

Re: Status of the ppc port

2003-06-02 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Peter Bruin wrote: > Hi, > > I've started working on the PowerPC port again, and there's definitely > been some progress. The Hurd boots to the multiuser login shell, and > most servers seem to work (not storeio and pfinet, currently). ext2 > file systems

Re: Status of ftpfs?

2000-12-07 Thread Neal H Walfield
> What errors do you get? What sites are you trying to connect to? > I successfully used ftpfs to bind /ftp to ftp.debian.org:/ and > copy files. Its painfully slow, but that might be due to the Hurd > running under vmware. I have not used it lately (read: at least eight months or more). Howeve

Re: Status of ftpfs?

2000-12-07 Thread oberg
> > > What is the current status of the ftpfs translator? > > Mark claims it works. It never works for me. What errors do you get? What sites are you trying to connect to? I successfully used ftpfs to bind /ftp to ftp.debian.org:/ and copy files. Its painfully slow, but that might be due to

Re: Status of ftpfs?

2000-12-05 Thread Neal H Walfield
> What is the current status of the ftpfs translator? Mark claims it works. It never works for me. > The CVS logs show that most development was done by Miles Bader > back in late 1997. The CVS log for ftpfs.h also says that Mr. Bader has > since left the FSF. He does not work on the hurd