Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Da Zheng, le Tue 04 Aug 2009 16:15:10 +0800, a écrit :
>> The driver reads the keyboard status from the port 0x64, and it seems OK. It
>> doesn't work when the driver tries to write the command to the port 0x64.
>> The whole process dies. (the port 0x64 is used for both r
Da Zheng, le Tue 04 Aug 2009 16:15:10 +0800, a écrit :
> The driver reads the keyboard status from the port 0x64, and it seems OK. It
> doesn't work when the driver tries to write the command to the port 0x64. The
> whole process dies. (the port 0x64 is used for both read the status and
> writin
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> There are two ways to use it: either the GNU Mach RPCs
> i386_io_perm_create and i386_io_perm_modify (see
> [gnumach]/i386/include/mach/i386/mach_i386.defs) can directly be used,
> or the more standard (at least on x86) glibc
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:58:42AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> But iopl is a all-or-nothing-like thing (all I/O ports),
I see...
I guess though that fixing that would still be easier than writing a
proper ioper
Hello!
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > There are two ways to use it: either the GNU Mach RPCs
> > i386_io_perm_create and i386_io_perm_modify (see
> > [gnumach]/i386/include/mach/i386/ma
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> There are two ways to use it: either the GNU Mach RPCs
> i386_io_perm_create and i386_io_perm_modify (see
> [gnumach]/i386/include/mach/i386/mach_i386.defs) can directly be used,
> or the more standard (at least on x86) glibc
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:15:10PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> I am porting the keyboard driver to the user space and here is my problem:
> The driver reads the keyboard status from the port 0x64, and it seems
> OK. It doesn't work when the driver tries to write the command to the
> port 0x64.
Hello,
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> No. ioperm is expected to work just fine, so please tell us if there are
> problems with it. There are two ways to use it: either the GNU Mach RPCs
> i386_io_perm_create and i386_io_perm_modify (see
> [gnumach]/i386/include/mach/i386/mach_i386.defs) can directly b
Hello!
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:23:49PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> There is some code in gnumach that implements ioperm, but it doesn't
> work. I think tschwinge has told me that. But could anyone tell why it
> doesn't work, how much work is left and when it will work?
No. ioperm is expected to
