Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2013-05-17 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:35:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 12:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html > > replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue [...] > should be sent upstream: where to report, bug-...@gnu.org?

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2013-05-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 13 May 2013 13:35:37 +0200, a écrit : > On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 12:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > as written in > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html > > replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue in addition to the MACH issue. > > See the second par

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2013-05-13 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 12:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Samuel, > > as written in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html > replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue in addition to the MACH issue. > See the second part of the patch below. This fix was not submitted as a > De

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2013-05-11 Thread Svante Signell
Samuel, as written in http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue in addition to the MACH issue. See the second part of the patch below. This fix was not submitted as a Debian bug, due to the freeze and lack of feedback. The MACH stuff is alr

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2012-10-02 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 09:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 27 Sep 2012 09:15:23 +0200, a écrit : > > $ gcc -dM -E -x c - < /dev/null | grep -i mach > > #define __MACH 1 > > #define __MACH__ 1 > > #define MACH 1 > > On Linux i386, both "linux" and "i386" mac

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2012-09-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 27 Sep 2012 09:15:23 +0200, a écrit : > $ gcc -dM -E -x c - < /dev/null | grep -i mach > #define __MACH 1 > #define __MACH__ 1 > #define MACH 1 On Linux i386, both "linux" and "i386" macros are defined, which poses its own problems too. I'd indeed tend to s

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2012-09-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:02:29 +0200, Svante Signell > wrote: > > gdb does not build from source any longer since gdb-multiarch packages > > was enabled in 7.4.1-1. The build problems are due to two reasons: > > I also once had a

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

2012-09-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:02:29 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > gdb does not build from source any longer since gdb-multiarch packages > was enabled in 7.4.1-1. The build problems are due to two reasons: I also once had a look and came to the same conclusion. > First the reserved keyword MACH