Hello,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:57:02AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:06:03PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:45:43PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
> > > My suggestion is testing them internally. For example, you can setup
> > > two pf
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:06:03PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:45:43PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> > My suggestion is testing them internally. For example, you can setup
> > two pfinets on the same eth-multiplexer and write some testing
> > programs to transmit pac
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:18:35PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:21:22PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I've found out a stunning thing (for me) today: I checked out a fresh
> > Hurd from CVS in the following way:
> >
> > $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.sa
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:21:22PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:55:51AM +0800, Zheng Da wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sergiu
> > Ivanov wrote:
> > > This makes me suspect that eth-multiplexer is not the troublesome
> > > component we are looking for
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:55:51AM +0800, Zheng Da wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sergiu
> Ivanov wrote:
> > This makes me suspect that eth-multiplexer is not the troublesome
> > component we are looking for. Do you share this opinion or do you
> > still insist on my trying to de
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sergiu
Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This makes me suspect that eth-multiplexer is not the troublesome
> component we are looking for. Do you share this opinion or do you
> still insist on my trying to deprive eth-multiplexer of the
> functionality of setting the
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:02:51PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Da Zheng wrote:
>> I should test again whether they can work if the Ethernet card cannot
>> be set in promiscuous mode.
>> I look into the code of eth-multiplexer again. It seems that
>> eth-multiplexer should work even if the
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 04:34:22PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> Do you suggest trying the following (where pfinet is the path to the
>> modified pfinet executable):
>>
>> # settrans -a /servers/socket/2 pfinet -i /dev/eth0 -a -g -m
>>
>>
>> If so, it fails with pfin
Hi,
Da Zheng wrote:
eth-mulitplexer needs to set the ethernet card to the promiscuous
mode. I wonder if that can cause the problem.
Unfourtunately, when I try googling for ``qemu'' and ``promiscuous''
together, I get the information about setting up bridged networking
with the guest sy
Hi,
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:45:43PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
I failed to install Hurd in Q - the qemu for Mac OS X, so I cannot test
eth-multiplexer in qemu.
Could you just run the modified pfinet directly on gnumach? So we can
test which component has the pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
