Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution

2005-07-29 Thread Barry deFreese
- Original Message - From: "Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 9:54 AM Subject: Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution They will have no cl

Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution

2005-07-29 Thread Richard M. Stallman
They will have no clue that it is an OS unless we are VERY explicit in calling it an OS. So we should refer to is as "the GNU operating system". Sure, there's no problem with saying "operating system" to help clarify things. ___ Bug-hurd

Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution

2005-07-29 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
And now that we're about to release it, Let me point out that we are not "about to release it" (in the sense of a 1 year time frame). Lots of work still needs to be done for it to be remotely usable for "normal people". We don't even have a installer yet, or a recent snapshot that boots to th

Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution

2005-07-28 Thread John Williams
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 20:11 -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote: > The operating system we are building is called GNU. I think I can now accept this, despite my previous posts. I think the way to explain it is this: Windows is an operating system, sometimes it is referred to as the "Windows OS". A

Re: RFC - GNU System Distribution

2005-07-28 Thread Richard M. Stallman
The operating system we are building is called GNU. Developing the GNU system is a big project. It's called the GNU Project. We developed many programs specifically for GNU, and these are called GNU programs. We developed some licenses, such as the GNU GPL. But GNU is, first of all, the operating