> > The Hurd can run in parallel to itself. If it can run in parallel to other
> > OSs depends if those OSs can run on Mach, and if you have a bootloader for them
> > that runs in the Hurd.
>
> If I understood Farid correctly, he ran the Hurd beside Lites.
Yes, that's correct.
-Farid.
--
Fari
> What about it? The Hurds don't know about each other. There are no ports
> from the one Hurd accessible to the others (well, I should say almost no
> ports, but it's the user starting the sub-Hurd who eventually will be able
> to decide). In particular, no privileges are leaked.
Well, boot i
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:19:23PM +, Patrick Strasser wrote:
> I think a sub-Hurd is the Hurd's way of doing this at the moment. What
> can it do for us in this direction,
It can already do everything. It runs its own filesystems, its own proc
server, its own pfinet server, and has its own
