> Is there any reasonable way to to issue a #warning if something uses
> that, but permit the compile to continue?
Not for a compile-time constant (unless there is some new cpp feature in
gcc that I don't know about). GNU ld's symbol warnings provide a way to do
that at link time for symbols (g
> Even though so many applications depend on MAXPATHLEN, why doesn't
> Hurd define it as an arbitrary number (e.g. INT_MAX)?
The way that most programs use MAXPATHLEN is as the size statically-sized
arrays, so an unreasonably large value will either just not work or will
eat unreasonable amount
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:07:04AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> Even though so many applications depend on MAXPATHLEN, why doesn't
> Hurd define it as an arbitrary number (e.g. INT_MAX)?
Is there any reasonable way to to issue a #warning if something uses
that, but permit the compile to con
