Re: Initial target(s) for libmob

Hi, On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:01:54PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:50:01AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > > > ioctl()s are always specific to a particular device class, and > > > > thus the server(s) implementing (or proxying) it. It makes > > > > p

Re: Initial target(s) for libmob

Hi, On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:50:01AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > > ioctl()s are always specific to a particular device class, and thus > > > the server(s) implementing (or proxying) it. It makes perfect sense > > > for a server implementing a specific device, also to provide the

Re: Initial target(s) for libmob

Hi, On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 04:18:55PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:44:59PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > I was going to refute your suggestion of ioctl handlers, but in > arguing about it back and forth with myself, I ended up agreeing with > you. ;