Roland McGrath wrote:
does not make sense
Damn, I figured it didn't. Do we really need locking here or can we do
without until we can implement nptl?
Thanks!
Barry
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
does not make sense
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #18217 (project hurd):
Roland: ``Uli abused the macros. To support the use he wants, __libc_once
should be revamped in all its implementations to return a value or have a
variant that does (value says whether fn just ran).''
Is there any r
Uli abused the macros. To support the use he wants, __libc_once should be
revamped in all its implementations to return a value or have a variant
that does (value says whether fn just ran).
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.or
