Re: [bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-08-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 07 Aug 2006 12:35:58 +0200, a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:31:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > BTW, there are other places that might need such fixes: [...] > > Samuel, thanks for doing that! > > Feel free to ``go wild'' with all that code while I'll be away

Re: [bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-08-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:31:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > BTW, there are other places that might need such fixes: [...] Samuel, thanks for doing that! Feel free to ``go wild'' with all that code while I'll be away from this week's Wednesday until early in September. (Invited to

Re: [bug #17338] GNU Mach vs. GCC 4.1

2006-08-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
BTW, there are other places that might need such fixes: fnsave, frstor & alike _do_ manipulate memory, and hence should clobber it. Lock and bit set/clear macros should too. And there are sometimes some spurious volatiles: the first get_eflags() definition for instance. And just using things like u