Samuel Thibault, le sam. 03 avril 2021 15:09:47 +0200, a ecrit:
> Damien Zammit, le dim. 04 avril 2021 00:00:56 +1100, a ecrit:
> > >> +acpi_status
> > >> +acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_semaphore handle, u32 units, u16 timeout)
> > >> +{
> > >> +int i;
> > >> +
> > >> +if (!timeout)
>
Damien Zammit, le dim. 04 avril 2021 00:00:56 +1100, a ecrit:
> >> +acpi_status
> >> +acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_semaphore handle, u32 units, u16 timeout)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + if (!timeout)
> >> + timeout = 1;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> >> +
On 3/4/21 11:49 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Damien Zammit, le sam. 03 avril 2021 23:16:33 +1100, a ecrit:
>> +acpi_status
>> +acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *lockp)
>> +{
>> +acpi_semaphore sema = NULL;
>> +if (acpi_os_create_semaphore(1, 0, &sema) == AE_OK) {
>> +*lockp = s
Damien Zammit, le sam. 03 avril 2021 23:16:33 +1100, a ecrit:
> +acpi_status
> +acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *lockp)
> +{
> + acpi_semaphore sema = NULL;
> + if (acpi_os_create_semaphore(1, 0, &sema) == AE_OK) {
> + *lockp = sema;
No, directly pass lockp to acpi_os_create_
