Re: [PATCH] building/installing iso9660fs.static by default

2005-08-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Does it make sense to build iso9660fs statically and install that >in /hurd? > > No it doesn't, IMHO. iso9660fs isn't exactly a file-system that a > normal user would use for the root file-system. Actually, the reason for wanting this one

Re: [PATCH] building/installing iso9660fs.static by default

2005-07-23 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:08:37PM -0400, Ben Asselstine wrote: > Does it make sense to build iso9660fs statically and install that in > /hurd? Why not eh? Patch follows. The Debian package does this by passing --enable-static-progs='ext2fs,ufs,iso9660fs' to ../configure, btw, but I think it mak

Re: [PATCH] building/installing iso9660fs.static by default

2005-07-23 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Does it make sense to build iso9660fs statically and install that in /hurd? No it doesn't, IMHO. iso9660fs isn't exactly a file-system that a normal user would use for the root file-system. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists