Hi,
2017-12-19 19:21 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Is it not actually valid for posix systems in general? (except the
> cond_wait thing which I patched over)
That's what the port/ folder contains:
- lwipopts.h is for configuring the stack parameters
- cc.h is for integrating the stack in our
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 19:21 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joan Lledó, on mar. 19 déc. 2017 19:11:40 +0100, wrote:
> > - The patches in debian/patches are not enough to make the server
> > work, for instance, we're calling lwip_poll() which is not in 2.0.3
> > nor any patch in the package.
I tho
Joan Lledó, on mar. 19 déc. 2017 19:11:40 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > I am talking about the files you created in your repository, they are
> > hold a GPL copyright notice. I guess at some point we will want to see
> > them maintained within lwip, and thus BSD-
Hi Samuel,
2017-12-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> I am talking about the files you created in your repository, they are
> hold a GPL copyright notice. I guess at some point we will want to see
> them maintained within lwip, and thus BSD-licensed.
>
I've been reviewing the reposotory you
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 19:27:30 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 17:28 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > BTW, your lwip code should probably be made BSD-licensed, just like the
> > rest of lwip.
>
> Mmm, I think I don't know what you mean, if I send patches to a
> BSD-licensed project, they are
2017-12-18 17:28 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> BTW, your lwip code should probably be made BSD-licensed, just like the
> rest of lwip.
Mmm, I think I don't know what you mean, if I send patches to a
BSD-licensed project, they are BSD too, right?
On 18 Dec 2017, at 17:09, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> James Clarke, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:06:28 +, wrote:
>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> We need to know what
James Clarke, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:06:28 +, wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
> >> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> >>> We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
> >>> eventually g
On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
>> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
>>> We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
>>> eventually get to upstream, and what may not get to
>>> upstream.
>>
>> There'r
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
> > eventually get to upstream, and what may not get to
> > upstream.
>
> There're also some patches that are in upstream, I think it wo
2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Ok, but I don't see that base in your repository, the first commit
> already has a lot of source code which is not in 2.0.1.
Oh, yes. That's because I first imported all lwip 2.0.1 code to my
lwip-hurd repository and made many changes there. Then I mo
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 12:58:35 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 2:32 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > Or are you actually based on another lwip?
>
> Yes, It's based in the version 2.0.1, as I started to work on this
> back in February.
Ok, but I don't see that base in your repository,
Hello,
2017-12-18 2:32 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Or are you actually based on another lwip?
Yes, It's based in the version 2.0.1, as I started to work on this
back in February. I plan to upgrade liblwip to the last version in a
few months.
Hello,
I'm however having a hard time matching your
g...@github.com:jlledom/liblwip-hurd.git repository with the upstream
https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/git/lwip.git repository. Since the plan
is to just pick up upstream as much as possible, we need to keep the
delta small.
Or are you actually b
Hello,
At last, found the time to commit this :)
Huge hanks!
Samuel
Joan Lledó, on lun. 13 nov. 2017 08:31:45 +0100, wrote:
> After working on the perl tests fails, I can say they are due to bugs in
> lwip, not in our server. I've already sent the bug reports.
Heh, nice :D
Samuel
Joan Lledó, on dim. 29 oct. 2017 11:46:20 +0100, wrote:
> the perl testsuite indeed found some bugs. So I'll send the new patch
> when I have them fixed.
Heh :)
Thanks!
Samuel
2017-10-22 17:25 GMT+02:00 Samuel Thibault :
>>
>> Unfortunately, lwip doesn't provide a lwip_ppoll() function.
>
> Ah, I saw it in lwipv6, I thought it was generally available.
>
> That being said, it'd be better to make the code already use struct
> timespec, converting to coarser resolution only
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on mer. 18 oct. 2017 09:24:22 +0200, wrote:
> >> +static error_t
> >> +lwip_io_select_common (struct sock_user *user,
> >> +mach_port_t reply,
> >> +mach_msg_type_name_t reply_type,
> >> +struct timeval *tv, int *select
Joan Lledó, on mer. 18 oct. 2017 09:24:22 +0200, wrote:
> > Last but not least, did you try to run the glibc testsuite while running
> > this TCP/IP stack? It would probably find potential bugs. Also, the
> > perl testsuite is probably a nice thing to run.
>
> I need help here. I've been googlin
Hello Samuel,
Thanks for taking your time reviewing my code.
2017-09-27 0:44 GMT+02:00 Samuel Thibault :
>> +error_t
>> +lwip_S_io_write (struct sock_user * user,
>> + char *data,
>> + size_t datalen,
>> + off_t offset, mach_msg_type_number_t * amount)
>> +{
Samuel Thibault, on mer. 27 sept. 2017 00:44:15 +0200, wrote:
> Last but not least, did you try to run the glibc testsuite while running
> this TCP/IP stack? It would probably find potential bugs. Also, the
> perl testsuite is probably a nice thing to run.
(I'm not saying I won't commit this wor
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on mer. 06 sept. 2017 10:09:36 +0200, wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lwip/iioctl-ops.c
> +/* Get the interface from its name */
> +static struct netif *
> +get_if (char *name)
...
> +
> + netif = netif_list;
> + while (netif != 0)
> +{
> + if (strcmp (netif_get_state
>> # Whether we found libgcrypt.
>> HAVE_LIBGCRYPT = @HAVE_LIBGCRYPT@
>>
>> +# Whether we found libgcrypt.
>
> Copy-paste error :)
>
Ops!, yes... you've got a sharp eye!
Hi Joan,
On 24 Aug 2017, at 18:49, Joan Lledó wrote:
> ...
> diff --git a/config.make.in b/config.make.in
> index dfbf0c1..f74220e 100644
> --- a/config.make.in
> +++ b/config.make.in
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@ HAVE_SUN_RPC = @HAVE_SUN_RPC@
> # Whether we found libgcrypt.
> HAVE_LIBGCRYPT = @HAVE_LIBGC
25 matches
Mail list logo
