"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't recall giving you any kind of permission to post private
> messages to a public list. This is what is inapprorpiate behaviour.
In this context, it is entirely appropriate.
Alfred, you don't get to declare the list standards. It is clear
I don't recall giving you any kind of permission to post private
messages to a public list. This is what is inapprorpiate behaviour.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right, as always you accuse me of things and not giving me a chance to
> defend. Your lack of morals and ethics is disgusting.
Well, proof yourself. Show us all what you did the past 5 years or
so. This mailinglist is not filtered.
As for me,
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Do not post further messages like this on the bug-hurd list.
>
> I will post anything I deem justified. If you wish to complain about
> inapproproate messages, complain at Thomas, Michael and Marco who are
> trying to make this into `accuse Alf
Do not post further messages like this on the bug-hurd list.
I will post anything I deem justified. If you wish to complain about
inapproproate messages, complain at Thomas, Michael and Marco who are
trying to make this into `accuse Alfred of everything possible'.
___
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marco, if you want to throw out accusations, lies, and insults, do it
> somewhere else.
Alfred, you began this thread with a rude and inappropriate message.
You have now accused Marco of lying.
I know that in your world you have never, ever, don
Although I never met Thomas, he has the right set of social skills
required for this job.
Social skills isn't what is required for this "job", whatever that is.
Technical skills are; which Thomas might or might not have, but his
help to commit things will be nice to have.
_
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marco, if you want to throw out accusations, lies, and insults, do it
> somewhere else.
What are you talking about? Can you elaborate?
--
Marco
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://list
Marco, if you want to throw out accusations, lies, and insults, do it
somewhere else.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But this prompts me to say that, in my judgment, Thomas Schwinge
> should be invited if he is willing to be an official approver of
> patches. This was discussed last fall, but it did not reach a final
> decision, in part because my work load beca
I'm simply reminding people of this fact.
And I'm simply reminding you that you have no say on this matter.
But this prompts me to say that, in my judgment, Thomas Schwinge
should be invited if he is willing to be an official approver of
patches.
What the heck does `offical approver
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 14:20 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas, if you are willing, please say so, and then we'll declare this
> official. Marcus and Roland have already agreed this is sensible, so
> there was no reason for delay except that my workload caused it to get
> bumped from my at
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> And to make it clear to everyone else, Thomas is not the maintainer,
>> nor an active developer of the Hurd. And has absolutley no say in
>> this matter what so ever.
>
> And you are? And you d
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Have I summed it up?
>
> No, you forgot the part of you not being the maintainer, and not doing
> any work on the project. I.e. not having anything to say at all. The
> only thing you have done for the past year has been giving totally
> usele
Which is what I said, without your bitter and hateful tone.
[... snip ...]
So I'm not sure what, other than your hate for me, you wish to
convey.
I have no idea where you got that, I have neither postive feelings for
you, or negative ones. Maybe if you stopped telling yourself that I
f
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>And you are? And you do? Says who?
>
> I have been taking care of all the patches for the last year or two, I
> have also been the one who has asked, re-asked, and re-re-asked to get
> thingies applied. You have not done squat. So unless I m
And you are? And you do? Says who?
I have been taking care of all the patches for the last year or two, I
have also been the one who has asked, re-asked, and re-re-asked to get
thingies applied. You have not done squat. So unless I missed your
divine work somewhere, I'm the one deciding how
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And to make it clear to everyone else, Thomas is not the maintainer,
> nor an active developer of the Hurd. And has absolutley no say in
> this matter what so ever.
And you are? And you do? Says who?
Thomas
__
And to make it clear to everyone else, Thomas is not the maintainer,
nor an active developer of the Hurd. And has absolutley no say in
this matter what so ever.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okie, I'm fed up with the braindead crap that the Savannah tracker is.
>
> Always send patches directly to bug-hurd first, when they have been
> discussed, and OKed, _then_ add it to the brain dead pile of shit that
> the Savannah tracker is. Not
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 02:31 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Okie, I'm fed up with the braindead crap that the Savannah tracker is.
What an extraordinarily differentiated statement of constructive
criticism.
> Always send patches directly to bug-hurd first, when they have been
> discussed, and OK
When it has been added, to not change it. Consider it as a commit
to the CVS, and it is there forever. Make a new bug report for the
patch, and follow the above rules.
Let me clarify, instead of changing the patch, send a new bug report
that fixes the filed patch, basically the same thi
Okie, I'm fed up with the braindead crap that the Savannah tracker is.
Always send patches directly to bug-hurd first, when they have been
discussed, and OKed, _then_ add it to the brain dead pile of shit that
the Savannah tracker is. Not before, not later. When it has been
added, to not change
23 matches
Mail list logo
