Olaf Buddenhagen, le Sat 19 Sep 2015 01:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:35:28PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > For me, the idea could be that you run a rump translator per PCI device,
> > which exposes devices appropriately. We'd need a common PCI translator
> > to multipl
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:35:28PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> For me, the idea could be that you run a rump translator per PCI device,
> which exposes devices appropriately. We'd need a common PCI translator
> to multiplex accesses to the config space, but otherwise working on
> a PCI de
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:14:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 17/09/15 a les 23:25, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> >Robert Millan, le Thu 17 Sep 2015 21:55:32 +0200, a écrit :
> >>My understanding is there's no need for an arbiter / multiplexer
> >>as long as all the code playing with PCI
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:55:32PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 17/09/15 a les 17:35, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> >For me, the idea could be that you run a rump translator per PCI
> >device,
>
> That doesn't fit very well with the way Rump works. With Rump you
> select drivers rather th
