Re: Oskit Mach: [patch] consider_lmm_collect: Test always true

2005-05-17 Thread Marco Gerards
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >[ I've CCed John Tobey as I'm not sure if he has assigned the > copyright. ] > > For such a small change a copyright assigment isn't needed. For GNU Mach, copyright assignments are not needed at all. That is what the FSF told me. -- Marco

Re: Oskit Mach: [patch] consider_lmm_collect: Test always true

2005-05-17 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
For GNU Mach, copyright assignments are not needed at all. That is what the FSF told me. Oh, cool... Didn't know about that. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Oskit Mach: [patch] consider_lmm_collect: Test always true

2005-05-14 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
[ I've CCed John Tobey as I'm not sure if he has assigned the copyright. ] For such a small change a copyright assigment isn't needed. Long time ago we got a bug report in Debian with a patch for Oskit Mach. What bug does it fix? (the bit you quoted only had lots of "ifs") As for

Oskit Mach: [patch] consider_lmm_collect: Test always true

2005-05-14 Thread Guillem Jover
[ I've CCed John Tobey as I'm not sure if he has assigned the copyright. ] Hi, Long time ago we got a bug report in Debian with a patch for Oskit Mach. Here it is: In gnumach/oskit/osenv_mem.c, consider_lmm_collect() looks as if it can stop short of transfering the optimal number of pages fro