On 14 Mar 2000, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> 1 wants Linux binary compatibility
>
Is there any in plans???
--
Mariusz Wołoszyn
Internet Security Specialist, Internet Partners, GTS Poland
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:47:42PM +, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> >14 (25%) and some of 7 (12%) could be solved by porting libggi to
> gnumach/hurd,
> >what shoudn't be so hard.
> >This is the biggest single solution.
>
> Would this make X displaying on the HURD a possibility?
Yes
> I guess it wou
>14 (25%) and some of 7 (12%) could be solved by porting libggi to
gnumach/hurd,
>what shoudn't be so hard.
>This is the biggest single solution.
Would this make X displaying on the HURD a possibility?
I guess it would if X rendering were to be ported to ggi?
Nic Ferrier
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:24:45PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> As promised, here are the tallied results of the informal survey I
> conducted last week. I'm no statistician, but I'll take a wild guess
> and say these results are 87.3% accurate, 19 times out of 20. ;)
> 61 responded to the
As promised, here are the tallied results of the informal survey I
conducted last week. I'm no statistician, but I'll take a wild guess
and say these results are 87.3% accurate, 19 times out of 20. ;)
61 responded to the survey
13 no complaints
7 filesystem corruption
7 needs PPP
7 needs X
7 wan
