Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-07-15 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:24:50AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Small run down on what is fixed and what is not fixed in CVS, and what > has a patch attached. I'll see if I can comment about some of the > patches in more detail today (I'll probobly comment about them in a > reply to this mail)

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-27 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 10:41, Robert Millan wrote: > I don't have much experience with dbs-style packaging though. Jeff, what > do you suggest? cdbs? Yes - I recommend cdbs. The problem is that there's a bunch of magic in the documentation handling because our build env doesn't behave in an expect

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > If someone beats me to it, then great. > > > > no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-27 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > If someone beats me to it, then great. > > no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a minute to check mail) finished with exams! :) looking at the package, i

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-23 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable > in the archive. I think I've uploaded a tetex-bin build some time ago. Does it look like a build problem or are there bugs in the package? I guess I could try

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-22 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable > in the archive. Decided that solving that was a task for Monday as I > have a guest in town. tetex-bin has been broken a pair of times for all arches (see the c

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-21 Thread Jeff Bailey
I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable in the archive. Decided that solving that was a task for Monday as I have a guest in town. If someone beats me to it, then great. Tks, Jeff Bailey On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 20:08, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003

Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhauldebian/rules)

2003-06-21 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:05:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > with this one there are six bugs for package hurd in the BTS that > either are fixed in CVS or have an attached patch. > > a fast look brought me: > > 190732, 156600, 184344, 149309, 177486, 196913 > > are you going to upload a new