On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:49:24AM -0500, John Tobey wrote:
> I definitely intend to hack with it. One potential problem for using
> my work (assuming it becomes usable) in an effort to port the Hurd to
> L4 is that I am prefering Linux dependency to x86 dependency where I
> have such a choice.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:40:50AM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote:
> Wow, I'm truly impressed! I didn't yet download nor tried it, but
Impressed by my insanity, you mean. ;)
> will do so on my development NetBSD/x86 box, just to be sure that it
> really is POSIXish enough for my needs ;) As you've cor
Hi John,
> http://tobeyhutchison.com/jtobey/Hurd/gnumach-otop.tar-0.0.0.bz2
>
> What this hopes to be is enough of GNUMach ported to POSIX/Linux to be
> able to run the Hurd binaries where they have been sitting on my disk
> since the last time I booted them up.
Wow, I'm truly impressed! I didn'
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:25:56PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Well, frankly I think you're nuts. But more power to you.
> For your stated goals and constraints, I would just go with plex86.
> But if you really get this approach to work usably, it could be interesting.
One thing I forgot to m
Well, frankly I think you're nuts. But more power to you.
For your stated goals and constraints, I would just go with plex86.
But if you really get this approach to work usably, it could be interesting.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
Hi all,
I've been toying with this for a few weeks and am no longer too
ashamed to tell y'all about it. I want to develop Hurd programs but
am too lazy to reboot or use two computers and too brainwashed by RMS
ideology to spring for vmware. Plus I am kind of interested to know
about Mach.
Put
