On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:55 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> >
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Are you saying I should wrap those includes
> around an #ifdef MACH_KDB up where the other includes are? If so, that
> makes sense to me.
I did not check whether the MACH_KDB check is right. B
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 13:43 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks, it's your favorite PITA again.. :-)
Index: i386/i386/trap.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/i386/i386/trap.c,v
retrievin
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 13:43 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi folks, it's your favorite PITA again.. :-)
> Index: i386/i386/trap.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/i386/i386/trap.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5.2.6
> diff -u -p -
Hi folks, it's your favorite PITA again.. :-)
* ddb/db_aout.c Include: db_output.h
* ddb/db_break.c Include: db_cond.h, db_output.h, and db_expr.h
* db_delete_cmd(): specify int for variable n
* ddb/db_command.c Include: db_macro.h, db_expr.h, and db_examine.h
* ddb/db_command.h Ad
