- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Samuel Thibault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach: locore.S copyin vs. c
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 16:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Barry deFreese, le Fri 10 Nov 2006 09:58:20 -0500, a écrit :
> > From my extremely limited knowledge of assembler, copyin and
> > copyinmsg look to be exactly the same.
>
> They are not t
Hi,
Barry deFreese, le Fri 10 Nov 2006 09:58:20 -0500, a écrit :
> From my extremely limited knowledge of assembler, copyin and
> copyinmsg look to be exactly the same.
They are not the same when using gprof: see asm.h, in that case ENTRY
does a bit more
Hello again folks,
Looking at more cleanup stuff I run across implicit declarations for copyin,
copyinmsg, copyout, and copyoutmsg. From my extremely limited knowledge of
assembler, copyin and copyinmsg look to be exactly the same. Is there any
reason not to drop all instances of copyinmsg i
