Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> On 03/02/16 23:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Other options include calling out to the ‘settrans’ command (inelegant
>> IMO), writing Guile bindings for some of the Hurd libraries, and/or some
>> sort of a MiG in Scheme (neat but takes some time!).
>
> We could
Hey
On 03/02/16 23:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Do you have examples of GNU/Linux uses that would make no sense?
>
After a quick look in mount's man page I think that maybe Roland was
referring to some flags (like relatime for example) that when passed to
mount, expect the Linux kernel to handle
Ludovic Courtès, on Wed 02 Mar 2016 22:31:41 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault skribis:
> > It can both help and hurt. Roland's concern is that we will probably not
> > want to provide a mount() that behaves like Linux, because in some cases
> > it may just not even make sense. So the "ported" softw
Samuel Thibault skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès, on Wed 02 Mar 2016 11:09:28 +0100, wrote:
>> Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
>> > 1) Merge wip-hurd branch.
>> > 2) Make the daemon handle chroot builds on the Hurd.
>> > Note here that on the Hurd, one does not need to be root to achieve
>> > isolation, so
Ludovic Courtès, on Wed 02 Mar 2016 11:09:28 +0100, wrote:
> Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> > 1) Merge wip-hurd branch.
> > 2) Make the daemon handle chroot builds on the Hurd.
> > Note here that on the Hurd, one does not need to be root to achieve
> > isolation, so I should change the daemon to use
Hi!
I realize I hadn’t responded to Manolis. Another +1 from me!
Some random comments:
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> Before May:
>
> 1) Merge wip-hurd branch.
> 2) Make the daemon handle chroot builds on the Hurd.
> Note here that on the Hurd, one does not need to be root to achieve
> isolatio
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:12:25PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just sending my big +1 on this project :)
Same here.
I'd like to note that I'm personally pushing so that we have less
students but with better projects. This one definitely fits.
--
Richard Braun
Hello,
Just sending my big +1 on this project :)
Samuel
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0200, Manolis Ragkousis wrote:
>> As I am still a student I would like to suggest continuing the project
>> of porting Guix to GNU/Hurd in this GSoC as well, with the objective of
>> having a working GuixSD/Hurd by the end of the summer.
Manolis Ragkousis writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I am still a student I would like to suggest continuing the project
> of porting Guix to GNU/Hurd in this GSoC as well, with the objective of
> having a working GuixSD/Hurd by the end of the summer.
>
> After discussions with Justus and Samuel in
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:46:30PM +0200, Manolis Ragkousis wrote:
> As I am still a student I would like to suggest continuing the project
> of porting Guix to GNU/Hurd in this GSoC as well, with the objective of
> having a working GuixSD/Hurd by the end of the summer.
Sounds great, I hope it wil
Hello everyone,
As I am still a student I would like to suggest continuing the project
of porting Guix to GNU/Hurd in this GSoC as well, with the objective of
having a working GuixSD/Hurd by the end of the summer.
After discussions with Justus and Samuel in FOSDEM about the Guix-Hurd
port I am st
12 matches
Mail list logo
