Re: GNU Mach and GNU Hurd copyright assignment papers

2006-02-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:07:49PM -0500, I wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:49:24PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:24:32AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > > > Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > >> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now

Re: GNU Mach and GNU Hurd copyright assignment papers

2006-02-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:49:24PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:24:32AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > > Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now to request and sign > > >> assignment papers for GNU Mach. >

Re: GNU Mach and GNU Hurd copyright assignment papers

2006-02-02 Thread cascardo
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:24:32AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now to request and sign > >> assignment papers for GNU Mach. > > > > Hmph, I requested that for the Hurd and GNU Mach, but now that I look

Re: GNU Mach and GNU Hurd copyright assignment papers

2006-02-02 Thread Marco Gerards
Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now to request and sign >> assignment papers for GNU Mach. > > Hmph, I requested that for the Hurd and GNU Mach, but now that I look > at it, in the copyright assignment paper I signed one year ago only > GNU

GNU Mach and GNU Hurd copyright assignment papers (was About Linux glue sofware interrupts. [PATCH])

2006-02-01 Thread Gianluca Guida
> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now to request and sign > assignment papers for GNU Mach. Hmph, I requested that for the Hurd and GNU Mach, but now that I look at it, in the copyright assignment paper I signed one year ago only GNU Hurd is mentioned. Is that enough? At that time, mo