Re: Coreutils nice sanity check failure

2005-05-01 Thread Soeren D. Schulze
> At Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:05:53 +0200, > Soeren D. Schulze wrote: > > after running the test script myself and thinking I a bit, I found the > > reason why it fails: > > > > Coreutils nice expects a priority range from 0 to 39 (mapped to -20..19 > > for the user) but Mach only provides 0..31. > >

Re: Coreutils nice sanity check failure

2005-04-26 Thread Neal H. Walfield
At Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:05:53 +0200, Soeren D. Schulze wrote: > after running the test script myself and thinking I a bit, I found the > reason why it fails: > > Coreutils nice expects a priority range from 0 to 39 (mapped to -20..19 > for the user) but Mach only provides 0..31. I think you mean:

Coreutils nice sanity check failure

2005-04-16 Thread Soeren D. Schulze
Hi everyone, after running the test script myself and thinking I a bit, I found the reason why it fails: Coreutils nice expects a priority range from 0 to 39 (mapped to -20..19 for the user) but Mach only provides 0..31. The POSIX layer in libc now attempts to convert these values to the respect