Re: Bug#156600: marked as done (FTBFS: hurd should build-depend onautoconf2.13)

2003-03-13 Thread Robert Millan
reopen 156600 thanks On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:32:58PM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote: > Why was this bug closed? Support for autoconf 2.5x was just added to > cvs recently and a debian package has not been produced from cvs since > last november. According to the CVS changelog.. 2002-10-23 J

Re: Bug#156600: marked as done (FTBFS: hurd should build-depend onautoconf2.13)

2003-03-13 Thread James A. Morrison
Why was this bug closed? Support for autoconf 2.5x was just added to cvs recently and a debian package has not been produced from cvs since last november. Jim On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 13:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:35:57 +0100 > with message-id <[

Bug#156600: marked as done (FTBFS: hurd should build-depend onautoconf2.13)

2003-03-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:35:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Debian Bug 156600 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t