Hi,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:16:56PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Last but not least, as I mentioned twice already, /hurd/ext2fs
> > probably doesn't work for shm! (At least it didn't when I last tried
> > it.) You need
Hello!
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:16:56PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, it is incorrect: The first programm to access it, will see the
> original setup -- and thus fail.
Thanks, correct. I noticed that when I had just sent the email.
> Here is a variant that actually works:
It als
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 07:35:34PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Fixing tmpfs shouldn't be so bad. Is anyone trying?
A while back, someone (I think Sergio Lopez) analized it, and concluded
that it's not easy to fix :-(
Anyways, IIRC the problem was only with actually reading/writing data.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:52:09AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> It was reported that the `tmpfs' translator doesn't really work and is
> thus not usable for being installed on `/dev/shm', so I propose the
> following for the mean time:
>
> #v+
> $ sudo settrans -cpgf /dev/shm /bin/sh -c '
Roland McGrath wrote:
Fixing tmpfs shouldn't be so bad. Is anyone trying? In the absence of
tmpfs, what's wrong with a plain directory on the root filesystem?
As far as I know Ben (bing) has tried without much success unfortunately.
Thanks,
Barry
___
Fixing tmpfs shouldn't be so bad. Is anyone trying? In the absence of
tmpfs, what's wrong with a plain directory on the root filesystem?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hello!
It was reported that the `tmpfs' translator doesn't really work and is
thus not usable for being installed on `/dev/shm', so I propose the
following for the mean time:
#v+
$ sudo settrans -cpgf /dev/shm /bin/sh -c 'settrans -cagf
/var/cache/dev_shm.backend /hurd/storeio -T copy:zero 2M &&
