Hi!
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:56:27 +0100, I wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:17:08 -0400, David Michael
> wrote:
> > mig has stopped using the "auto" keyword in its output.[1]
> > Without that keyword, gdb/reply_mig_hack.awk fails to match a
> > necessary pattern and outputs a bad gdb/process_reply_
Hi!
On Mon, 5 May 2014 23:49:33 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On 1/6/14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay, and thanks for the patches you posted. Here are
> > three patches, based on yours, that I intend to apply if there are no
> > further comments.
>
> What happened to applyin
On 1/6/14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay, and thanks for the patches you posted. Here are
> three patches, based on yours, that I intend to apply if there are no
> further comments.
What happened to applying these? (I'd like to cherrypick them for the
Debian package.)
On 01/06/2014 04:56 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay, and thanks for the patches you posted. Here are
> three patches, based on yours, that I intend to apply if there are no
> further comments.
I have no further comments (other than saying that IWBN to
have the rationale
Hi!
Sorry for the delay, and thanks for the patches you posted. Here are
three patches, based on yours, that I intend to apply if there are no
further comments.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:17:08 -0400, David Michael wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On 09/20/2013 01:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 01:43 AM, David Michael wrote:
>> (Copying gdb-patches this time.)
> But, we're missing all the context on the gdb-patches@ side.
Sorry about that--here's an explanation of the problems in GDB's build
process with current Hu
Hi!
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:47:21 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 01:43 AM, David Michael wrote:
> > [Hurd/GDB issue]
>
> But, we're missing all the context on the gdb-patches@ side.
I'll have a look.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgpw8Re4jp6nN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 09/20/2013 01:43 AM, David Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Copying gdb-patches this time.)
But, we're missing all the context on the gdb-patches@ side.
>
> Here is an updated patch to successfully build GDB after today's
> Hurd/mig changes.
--
Pedro Alves
Hi,
(Copying gdb-patches this time.)
Here is an updated patch to successfully build GDB after today's
Hurd/mig changes.
The awk script changes handle the "auto" keyword being dropped from
mig output, and that an "#if TypeCheck" line appears before
arg_check_name is defined in some new functions.
