Hi Thomas,
Thomas Schwinge skribis:
>> (there’s no licensing
>> issue since it’s a build tool.)
>
> But we'd include the file in the GNU Hurd/Mach/MIG source tress? Doesn't
> this affect the license of the whole packages then?
No. (Even if it did, we could request a license change on bug-gnul
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:18:42 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> How does this work if a new release is to be made? I first have to tag
> the Git tree to get a proper version number, I guess? But it's not too
> much of a problem, as the tag can stay local (and be modified further on,
> if it was ta
Hi!
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:43:04 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote:
> I agree that ‘git-version-gen’ is the way to go
I won't object.
> (there’s no licensing
> issue since it’s a build tool.)
But we'd include the file in the GNU Hurd/Mach/MIG source tress? Doesn't
Hi!
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:49:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac
>
> * version.m4: Remove file. Move m4 definitions to...
> * configure.ac (AC_INIT): ...here.
OK.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgp0BqRauHv69.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Guillem Jover skribis:
> Here's a first batch, some of those are based on the latest change to
> the =announce-N.N files which might seem to be post-release, I could
> provide instead the ones that last modified the version number, but
> that does not seem more accurate, I guess the most cor
What about removing dead (not compiled or used) linux code from gnumach?
It is merely confusing...
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 12:02:38 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:49:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I introduced that file because at the time the source tree had multiple
> > configure.in, so sharing the definitions seemed saner. But then this
> > could have been merged ba
Hello,
I agree that ‘git-version-gen’ is the way to go (there’s no licensing
issue since it’s a build tool.)
The change is basically two-fold:
1. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/configure.ac#n31
2. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/Makefile.am#n76
Would you lik
Hi!
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:49:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 00:13:51 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > In GNU Mach, we have a version.m4 where these fields are defined one and
> > for all. (I argue that a package's version definition does not really
> > belong into a gen
01
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:17:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac
* version.m4: Remove file. Move m4 definitions to...
* configure.ac (AC_INIT): ...here.
---
configure.ac |6 ++
version.m4 |4
2 files changed, 2 ins
10 matches
Mail list logo
