Svante Signell, le lun. 03 déc. 2018 16:57:03 +0100, a ecrit:
> I commented out the following three debian patches and updated my patch to
> fcntl.c.
> #hurd-i386/git-fcntl64.diff
> #hurd-i386/git-lockf-0.diff
> #hurd-i386/tg-WRLCK-upgrade.diff
> hurd-i386/fcntl.diff
Ok, then please say that, inst
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 16:25 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le lun. 03 déc. 2018 16:01:37 +0100, a ecrit:
> > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 19:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > I forgot here:
> >
> > Is this really needed?
>
> Please quote a bit more than just that, otherwise we don'
Svante Signell, le lun. 03 déc. 2018 16:01:37 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 19:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I forgot here:
>
> Is this really needed?
Please quote a bit more than just that, otherwise we don't have any
actual context.
But actually, are you really talking about t
On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 19:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I forgot here:
Is this really needed? From git-fcntl64.diff:
Index: glibc-2.28/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
===
--- glibc-2.28.orig/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
+++ glibc-2.28/sysd
I forgot here:
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 01 déc. 2018 18:59:48 +0100, a ecrit:
> case F_GETLK:
> case F_SETLK:
> case F_SETLKW:
> {
> struct flock *fl = va_arg (ap, struct flock *);
> struct flock64 fl64 = {
> .l_type = fl->l_type,
> .l_whence = fl->l_w
Svante Signell, le sam. 01 déc. 2018 16:27:24 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Attached is the patch adding support for file record locking in glibc,
> > as implemented in Hurd by Neal Walfield and others. This patch should be
> > applied after the corr
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the patch adding support for file record locking in glibc,
> as implemented in Hurd by Neal Walfield and others. This patch should be
> applied after the corresponding hurd patch series in case glibc and hurd
> are not
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 01:06 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Thu 08 Jan 2015 19:54:12 +0100, a écrit :
> > You made me confused, so all changes were not made. I think the malloc
> > version was better for symmetry reasons. Changed anyway.
>
> Which symmetry? You mean
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Thu 08 Jan 2015 19:54:12 +0100, a écrit :
> You made me confused, so all changes were not made. I think the malloc
> version was better for symmetry reasons. Changed anyway.
Which symmetry? You mean fl->foo vs fl.foo? It is not worth spending a
malloc call for this.
> +
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 19:06 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 18:03:31 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:56 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Yes you are right, no checks are made. I removed t
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 18:03:31 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:56 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Index: glibc-2.19/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> > > =
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:56 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Index: glibc-2.19/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> > ===
> > --- glibc-2.19.orig/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> > +++ gli
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:40:12 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Index: glibc-2.19/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> ===
> --- glibc-2.19.orig/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> +++ glibc-2.19/sysdeps/mach/hurd/fcntl.c
> @@ -128,56 +127,87 @@ __libc_f
Hi,
Attached is the patch adding support for file record locking in glibc,
as implemented in Hurd by Neal Walfield and others. This patch should be
applied after the corresponding hurd patch series in case glibc and hurd
are not built simultaneously. (Maybe the conversion functions as written
by
14 matches
Mail list logo
