On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> --- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/spawni.c
>> +++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/spawni.c
(...)
>> + ints[INIT_SIGPENDING] = _hurd_sigstate_pending (ss); /* XXX really? */
>
> Mmm. According to POSIX, fork() is supposed to clear pending signals,
> but GNU/Hurd
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:09:27AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeremie Koenig, le Tue 05 Jul 2011 05:15:28 +0200, a écrit :
> > I was worried about a case where the user would install a minuscule
> > stack, sufficient for their own handler, but not for a preemptor's one.
>
> I believe the user
Jeremie Koenig, le Tue 05 Jul 2011 05:15:28 +0200, a écrit :
> > These should probably be made extern inline.
>
> I agree as far as internal libc usage is concerned.
Yes. I wasn't meaning extern inline to outside libc. "extern inline"
precisely means that we also provide the symbol, for those wh
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:16:34AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeremie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 18:30:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > +sigstate_is_global_rcv (const struct hurd_sigstate *ss)
> > +_hurd_sigstate_lock (struct hurd_sigstate *ss)
> > +_hurd_sigstate_unlock (struct hurd_sigstate *ss)
> >
Jeremie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 18:30:21 +0200, a écrit :
> Currently each thread has a full "sigstate" structure which keeps track
> of the signal dispositions, blocking mask and pending signals for this
> thread. Process-wide signals are delivered to the main thread.
>
> However, the semantic
Currently each thread has a full "sigstate" structure which keeps track
of the signal dispositions, blocking mask and pending signals for this
thread. Process-wide signals are delivered to the main thread.
However, the semantics for POSIX threads is that all of them share the
same signal dispositi
