Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:31:53PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I'm inclined to think that a non-transparent unionmount should go away
> when the mountee has been shut down, too, because unionmount makes
> little sense without the mountee, be a transparent or a
> non-transparent one.
Well,
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:04:08AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Another topic for discussion was whether a non-transparent unionmount
> > should shut down the mountee on going away.
>
> Actually, what I was di
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Another topic for discussion was whether a non-transparent unionmount
> should shut down the mountee on going away.
Actually, what I was discussing is whether non-transparent unionmount
should go away when the mountee goes away
Hello,
I'm posting the patch series which makes unionmount transparent. I
hope the goal of all the patches will be clear from their commit
messages, so won't enumerate what they do in this mail.
The necessity of having non-transparent union mounts was discussed on
the IRC and the possible debugg
