At Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:16:01 +0200,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for sharing, I've had this kind of patch in my tree for a long
> with another, easier to parse, keypress, but this implementation seems
> nice as it keeps it ctrl-alt-d.
>
> Justus Winter, le Thu 21 Aug 2014 12:14:5
Applied, thanks!
Samuel
* i386/i386at/com.c (comintr): Invoke the debugger if ctrl-alt-d is
pressed.
* i386/i386at/com.h (kdb_kintr): Add declaration.
---
i386/i386at/com.c | 27 ++-
i386/i386at/com.h | 4
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/i386/i386at/com.c b/i38
Justus Winter, le Thu 21 Aug 2014 14:54:13 +0200, a écrit :
> > I like using 'C'-'@' instead of the magic-looking 4 :)
>
> Surely you meant 'D'-'@',
Oops, sure :)
Samuel
Hi :)
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-08-21 13:16:01)
> Mmm, but this means that an escape alone will be lost, which is a real
> problem for e.g. using vim :)
Right, that came to my mind after I send the patch (as always...).
> Can't escape rather be an static array indexed by unit number?
I beli
Hello,
Thanks for sharing, I've had this kind of patch in my tree for a long
with another, easier to parse, keypress, but this implementation seems
nice as it keeps it ctrl-alt-d.
Justus Winter, le Thu 21 Aug 2014 12:14:50 +0200, a écrit :
> if (tp->t_state&TS_ISOPEN) {
> +
* i386/i386at/com.c (comintr): Invoke the debugger if ctrl-alt-d is
pressed.
* i386/i386at/com.h (kdb_kintr): Add declaration.
---
i386/i386at/com.c | 23 ++-
i386/i386at/com.h | 4
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/i386/i386at/com.c b/i386/i3
