Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 10 Dec 2007 14:00:15 +0100, a écrit : > Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet > installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, as > well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: > i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

> Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet > installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, > as well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: > i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency line s

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

Hello! On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:00:15PM +0100, I wrote: > Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet > installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, as > well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: > i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency li

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

Hello! Guillem, Samuel, thanks for your investiagation, but I had not yet installed this patch for a reason. It should not be needed at all, as well as also the already-existing ``i386/i386at/boothdr.o: i386/i386/i386asm.h'' dependency line should not be needed. On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:23:08

Re: [PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

Guillem Jover, le Wed 05 Dec 2007 07:23:08 +0200, a écrit : > A rebuild of the whole Debian archive [0] revealed that gnumach is not > parallel build safe [1]. The following patch should fix this. Applied, thanks! Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-

[PATCH] Fix parallel build failure

Hi, A rebuild of the whole Debian archive [0] revealed that gnumach is not parallel build safe [1]. The following patch should fix this. regards, guillem [0] [1] 2007-12-05 Gui