What mattered with this? It was a interesting project
El mar, 9 feb 2021 a las 19:55, Marc Dunivan ()
escribió:
> Actually, I'm trying from the hard disk. I can boot from the cdrom and
>> have a working console if I choose "Legacy BIOS" in the bios
>> options. But I couldn't install Debian GNU/Li
>
> Actually, I'm trying from the hard disk. I can boot from the cdrom and
> have a working console if I choose "Legacy BIOS" in the bios
> options. But I couldn't install Debian GNU/Linux this way, if I recall
> correctly, so now I'm trying to keep uefi.
>
You probably already have addressed this
Andrea G. Monaco, le mar. 09 févr. 2021 16:34:21 +0100, a ecrit:
> could you please try it too Samuel?
To be frank, ATM I don't have time to spend on diverse things. I already
have a hard time managing to do my daily work without hitting my sleep
time.
Samuel
> Maybe before grub-mkconfig: GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX
> or using e to edit boot configuration and add:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html#gfxpayload
> they say it set the video mode in which Linux is started... but
> maybe it would apply to Mach too.
I tried, but i
About not seeing the GNU Mach console because the BIOS is started in graphical
mode...
if I understood the problem.
Reading Grub doc...
[This paragraph probably don't work because it says it inform Linux to use text
mode]
Maybe before grub-mkconfig: GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX
or using e to e
Andrea G. Monaco, le mar. 09 févr. 2021 02:34:41 +0100, a ecrit:
> Do you get that message only when using "multiboot2"?
Yes.
> In that case, could you please try at the grub2 prompt one line at a
> time? Does the "multiboot2" line evokes any output?
multiboot2 itself doesn't produce any output.
> grub does find both headers indeed, but that doesn't boot, it says
> "
> error: you need to load the kernel first.
> "
> as if it doesn't recognize the gnumach file as being a proper ELF kernel
> file.
Thanks for testing!
I get the same message when using "multiboot2". In my case I
Andrea G. Monaco, le mar. 09 févr. 2021 01:11:11 +0100, a ecrit:
> I think that keeping both headers is ok, because they are very small and
> have different magic numbers. You can choose which one to use at grub2,
> since "multiboot" and "multiboot2" are different commands.
>
> I checked that both
Hello,
while trying to figure out uefi, I wrote a multiboot2 header. It's an
exercise, but I'll share it anyway.
I think that keeping both headers is ok, because they are very small and
have different magic numbers. You can choose which one to use at grub2,
since "multiboot" and "multiboot2" a
