Hello,
Thanks for your patches, they were way better, I have applied them!
Joan Lledó, le sam. 28 août 2021 12:02:50 +0200, a ecrit:
> I tried to insert the same dev_pager_entry in both lists to avoid
> duplication, but the links field can't be shared between two lists,
Mmm, I think you can, by
Hi,
> all elements that have the same hash key end up in the same list
Ok, I missed that and the rest of the patch is wrong b/c of this.
I did what you said and created a second hash table indexed by device + offset,
leaving all code for dev_pager_hashtable untouched.
I tried to insert the sam
Hello,
Joan Lledó, le dim. 22 août 2021 12:51:09 +0200, a ecrit:
> I made the changed in the device mapper to implement the offset,
Thanks!
> limited the number of pagers per device to 1, so once the system got a
> pager for "mem" at offset 0, I couldn't give it another offset without
> that aff
Hi,
I made the changed in the device mapper to implement the offset, also updated
my branches of hurd and libpciaccess accordingly.
It wasn't as trivial as it seemed, there were some /* HACK */ lines which in
fact limited the number of pagers per device to 1, so once the system got a
pager f
