Alle venerdì 28 settembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> That change looks fine if the test still passes on Linux.
It does on Linux/x86_64, so I pushed it.
Thanks for the reviews,
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
That change looks fine if the test still passes on Linux.
What's the point of ever creating a local-domain socket node with mknod?
They are created on demand when you use bind.
Alle venerdì 28 settembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> > To be honest, I was making tst-mknodat.c pass on Hurd; if it does
> > not make sense that mknod can create sockets, then that test
> > should be removed, since all it does is testing the creation of a
> > single socket.
>
> I think the
> To be honest, I was making tst-mknodat.c pass on Hurd; if it does not
> make sense that mknod can create sockets, then that test should be
> removed, since all it does is testing the creation of a single socket.
I think the intent of the change is to test the mknodat interface, not any
particu
Alle venerdì 28 settembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> What's the point of ever creating a local-domain socket node with
> mknod?
To be honest, I was making tst-mknodat.c pass on Hurd; if it does not
make sense that mknod can create sockets, then that test should be
removed, since all it d
Hi,
attached there is a small patch to allow Hurd's mknod(at) to create also
sockets; while POSIX does not specify them, on Linux they seem to be
supported, and the implementation is very small.
I also took the liberty of simplifying the checks done to decide whether
use the device number provi
