thus staying compatible,
right?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/
["We're
de and using some trick (which shouldn't break anything, of
course) to store the real UID elsewhere?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacki
ango on core phenomena (esp. lossage related to
corruption of the malloc arena) or errors that smash the stack."
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
T
[Moving from help-hurd to bug-hurd.]
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:39:16AM +0200, Wolfgang Jährling wrote:
> > I have created a `mutations.h' file that contains the #defines for
> > FS_NOTIFY_IMPORTS (which is honored, but
to stdout. There are lots of possibilities to extend this
program, of course.
Instructions on compiling it are in the sources.
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu
m -r foo/
rm -rft foo/
would skip translated directories.
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-g
Hi!
The below patch adds the new --chroot option to the documentation of
settrans. (The wording is mostly taken from Roland's original mail.)
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
2002-05-07 Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* hurd.texi (Invoking settrans): Document new --ch
> the mmap'able file, so far no problem.
When the screen is resized, we would have to reorganize the scroll back
buffer, right? Could that be a problem for very large buffers?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd
omething with PATH_MAX, any maybe use realpath() */
#else
/* the same thing with dynamic allocation and
canonicalize_file_name() */
#endif
might even introduce a security problem. Thus we would need to recompile
all programs anyway. I can't see the point of having binary
compatiblity
.
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `-:._ "Omnis enim res, quae dando
Debian GNU/Linux user && Debian GNU/Hurd user `-:. non deficit, dum habetur
Hurd Hacking Guide - http://stdio.cjb.net/hhg.html ) et non datur, nondum
www.debian.org || www.gnu.org || h
ompatible with the
current one?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `-:._ "Omnis enim res, quae dando
Debian GNU/Linux user && Debian GNU/Hurd user `-:. non deficit, dum habetur
Hurd Hacking Guide - http://stdio.cjb.net/hhg.html ) et non datur, non
have this, it would be interesting to see if one of these standards
defines what the meaning of sys_nerr should be if there is no such
table.
Ok, so what should we done?
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `-:._ "Omnis enim res, quae dando
Debian GNU/Linux us
12 matches
Mail list logo