On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 22:17, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:41 PM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> >
> > William ML Leslie, le ven. 05 nov. 2021 21:18:50 +1100, a ecrit:
> > > > which makes the root filesystem reauthenticate all of the
>
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 21:41, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> William ML Leslie, le ven. 05 nov. 2021 21:18:50 +1100, a ecrit:
> > > which makes the root filesystem reauthenticate all of the
> > > processes file descriptors.
> >
> > It seems to eliminate a rather c
leges, while retaining access to that one
resource. I realise you can still do this by manipulating ports directly
(this only applies specifically to the contents of the descriptor table).
Is it required for posix compliance somehow, or was there some other
interesting use case?
--
William ML Leslie
On 5 January 2016 at 16:56, Svante Signell wrote:
> BTW: Why does Hurd contain such crappy dependencies such as perl. Is this part
> of upstream or Debian specific? The Debian package does not have it:
> apt-cache showsrc hurd | grep Build-Depends | grep -i perl
>
> Is there more perl code in ups
On 2 May 2013 09:56, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> "wheesid" was suggested at some point ;)
+1
I was going to suggest 'Janie', but GNU (/Hurd) isn't the chimera.
--
William Leslie
Notice:
Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered
under copyright law. You absolutely may repr
