Peter,
What you have done is jolly impressive, congratulations.
> "PB" == Peter Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PB> Most changes I had to make were either processor-related or
PB> had to do with the differences between GNUMach and OSF Mach
PB> (which already
> "DW" == Daniel Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DW> Well that's only one side of the truth. AMD had in those K6
DW> series an very fast loop optimation. It was so fast, that
DW> Windows couldn't boot correctly, because they did also
DW> counting down a counter. The result
Hi Hendrik,
> "HG" == Hendrik Groeneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It seems to me that the Hurd developers would like
gnumach/OSKit to routinely keep up to date with the latest
stable (say) Linux. It's just that they have other priorities at
the moment.
Marcus Brinkman writes:
>From here, there are only guile frames. The dynamic linking seems to be
> handled in scm_dynamik_link, with the meat of it (the os dependant part) in
> sysdep_dynl_link. Then there seem to be some more layers in guile
> responsible to wrap up the dlopen call in frame #
