Re: [PATCH] build system: gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp

> + *-*-gnu*) > + # Avoid complicated tests (see > + # ) and for now > + # simply assert that glibc does provide this, which is true for all > + # realistically usable configurations. Write "Hurd configurations", otherwise

Re: [PATCH] GNU/Hurd target configuration

> Please also tell me whether this could also be installed on the 4.3 and > 4.2 branches. No, I don't think so. Paolo

Re: GNU Hurd changes vs. GCC: ``regression fixes and docs only''

Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello! > > We, the GNU Hurd people, would like to get GCC in a compilable/usable > shape for us again, without needing to do the patching that was needed > since the 4.2 release. I have already some weeks ago sent the needed > patches to the gcc-patches mailing list, wher

Re: [PATCH] build system: gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp

> Even though the NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR issue is still being discussed, > in either way we'll need this patch installed. Any objections? Ok. But can you please create a PR and attach there all patches that I approve, but must wait until after your copyright assignment form will have been pro

Re: Port libgcc's configury for *-*-gnu*

Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello! > > Here is a patch to port libgcc's configury for *-*gnu*. Ok. Paolo

Re: [PATCH] GNU/Hurd target configuration

> Index: gcc/config.gcc > === > --- gcc/config.gcc(Revision 140963) > +++ gcc/config.gcc(Arbeitskopie) Ok. > Index: gcc/config/i386/gnu.h > === > --- gcc/config/